The Number NOT to Trust on the Nutrition Facts Label
Updated May 22, 2014
The Nutrition Facts label is less accurate than you might expect Tom Grill/Photographers Choice RF/Getty Images
Is the Nutrition Facts Label Accurate?
According to the policies of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), some variation in the stated calorie count on Nutrition Facts labels
is allowed. “The calories in a packaged food product can differ from
what is stated on the Nutrition Facts label and you may be getting more
calories than you bargained for,” says Catherine Lee, Ph.D., a food
scientist at Proctor and Gamble. Dr. Lee explains that “according to the
FDA, food products can contain as much as 20% more calories than what
is printed on the label. For example, a snack bar labeled as having 200
calories could potentially be 240 calories, and still be within the
government labeling guidelines.”
Of course, this doesn’t mean that all calorie counts should be ignored. A recent study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
found that commercially prepared foods had some variation in stated
calorie counts but overall the variations were statistically
insignificant. But then again, what matters in the lab and what matters
on the scale are two different things.
For example, Lean Cuisine Shrimp and Angel Hair Pasta stated
a count of 250 calories, but the researchers found that it actually
contained 319 calories, a difference of 28%. On the other hand, South Beach Living Roasted Turkey had a lower calorie value than stated, 222 calories versus 212 actual measured calories.
So, does this mean that you should buy South Beach rather than Lean
Cuisine? No. There were positive and negative variations in all brands
tested. But over time, small variations in calorie counts can add up to
pounds on the scale, so you should take the stated calorie count of any
packaged food with a grain of salt.
Are Restaurant Calorie Counts Accurate?
If you eat out often, the advertised calorie count of your favorite restaurant food
might be more of a concern if you are trying to lose weight. Several
recent media stories and research studies have confirmed that what’s
listed on the menu is not always the same as what lands on your plate.
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
revealed that many restaurants understate the calorie count of your
food. According to their research, “19% of individually tested foods
contained energy contents of at least 100 calories more than the stated
energy contents, an amount that could cause 5 – 7 kg of weight gain per
year if consumed daily.” Unfortunately, underreporting of calories
happened more often in foods that were labeled as low-calorie or
diet-friendly.
Should I Stop Counting Calories?
So, if advertised calorie counts aren’t accurate, should you dump your food diary and give up? No. If calorie counting
is helping you to limit the overall amount of food you eat and you are
successfully losing weight, then don’t ditch your plan. But if calorie
counting has not worked, this may be the reason why.
If you haven’t been able to lose weight, don’t rely on the exact
number of calories you consume. Instead, think about limiting your
portions. Most restaurant portions are too big. And in our homes, there
are quite a few foods that most of us overeat out of habit. Learn to check for the recommended serving size
on your food and eat only the portion that is suggested. You’re likely
to lose weight with common sense and a healthy dose of consumer savvy.
Sources:
Lorien E. Urban, Ms; Gerard E. Dallal, Phd; Lisa M. Robinson,
Rd; Lynne M. Ausman, Dsc, Rd; Edward Saltzman, Md; Susan B. Roberts,
Phd. "The Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Reduced-Energy, Commercially Prepared Foods." Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsJanuary 2010.
Lorien E. Urban, PhD, Megan A. McCrory, PhD, Gerard E. Dallal,
PhD, Sai Krupa Das, PhD, Edward Saltzman, MD, Judith L. Weber, PhD, RD,
Susan B. Roberts, PhD. " Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Restaurant Foods." Journal of the American Medical Association July 20, 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment